Home  ›  What Type of Source Is the Mit Review

What Type of Source Is the Mit Review

Written By Friday, 22 April 2022 Add Comment Edit

Mag about engineering science

MIT Engineering Review
MIT Technology Review modern logo.svg
Editor-in-Chief Mat Honan[1]
Categories Science, engineering
Frequency Bimonthly
Publisher Elizabeth Bramson-Boudreau
Full circulation
(2011)		 161,529[2]
First issue 1899; 123 years ago  (1899)
Visitor MIT Technology Review[3]
Country United States
Based in Cambridge, Massachusetts
Language English
Website technologyreview.com Edit this at Wikidata
ISSN 0040-1692

MIT Technology Review is a bimonthly magazine wholly endemic by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and editorially independent of the university.[4] Information technology was founded in 1899 equally The Technology Review ,[five] and was re-launched without "The" in its name on April 23, 1998 under and so publisher R. Bruce Journey. In September 2005, it was changed, under its then editor-in-main and publisher, Jason Pontin, to a form resembling the historical magazine.

Before the 1998 re-launch, the editor stated that "nix will exist left of the old magazine except the name." It was therefore necessary to distinguish between the modern and the historical Technology Review.[5] The historical magazine had been published by the MIT Alumni Association, was more closely aligned with the interests of MIT alumni, and had a more intellectual tone and much smaller public apportionment. The magazine, billed from 1998 to 2005 as "MIT's Magazine of Innovation," and from 2005 onwards as merely "published past MIT", focused on new technology and how it is commercialized; was sold to the public and targeted at senior executives, researchers, financiers, and policymakers, equally well as MIT alumni.[v] [half dozen]

In 2011, Engineering Review received an Utne Reader Contained Press Laurels for All-time Science/Technology Coverage.[7]

History [edit]

Original magazine: 1899–1998 [edit]

Technology Review was founded in 1899 under the name The Technology Review and relaunched in 1998 without "The" in its original name. It currently claims to exist "the oldest technology magazine in the globe."[8]

In 1899, The New York Times commented:[ix]

We requite a cordial welcome to No. ane of Vol. I of The Applied science Review, a Quarterly Mag Relating to the Massachusetts Institute of Engineering, published in Boston, and under charge of the Clan of Form Secretaries. Equally far as brand-upward goes, comprehend, paper, typography and illustrations are in keeping with the strong characteristics of the Institution it represents. This mag, as its editors announce, is intended to be "a clearing house of information and thought," and, as far as the Found of Applied science is concerned, "to increase its power, to minimize its waste matter, to insure [sic] among its endless friends the almost perfect co-operation."

The career path of James Rhyne Killian illustrates the close ties between Technology Review and the Institute. In 1926, Killian graduated from college and got his first job as assistant managing editor of Technology Review; he rose to editor-in-primary; became executive assistant to then-president Karl Taylor Compton in 1939; vice-president of MIT in 1945; and succeeded Compton as president in 1949.

The May 4, 1929 issue contained an article past Dr. Norbert Wiener, then Assistant Professor of Mathematics, describing some deficiencies in a paper Albert Einstein had published earlier that year. Wiener also commented on a central'southward critique of the Einstein theory saying:

The pretended incomprehensibility of the Einstein theory has been used as majuscule by professional anti-Einsteinians. Without prejudice to the cause of religion, I may remark that theological discussions have not at all times been distinguished by their grapheme of lucidity.

The historical Technology Review often published manufactures that were controversial, or critical of certain technologies. A 1980 issue contained an article by Jerome Wiesner attacking the Reagan administration's nuclear defense strategy. The comprehend of a 1983 issue stated, "Even if the fusion plan produces a reactor, no i will want it," and contained an article by Lawrence M. Lidsky,[10] associate director of MIT'south Plasma Fusion Center, challenging the feasibility of fusion power (which at the time was ofttimes fancied to be only around the corner). The May 1984 effect contained an exposé about microchip manufacturing hazards.

In 1966, the magazine started using a puzzle column started in Tech Engineering science News a few months earlier. Its author is Allan Gottlieb, who has now written the column for more than fifty years.[11]

As late equally 1967, the New York Times described Applied science Review as a "scientific journal." Of its writing style, author George V. Higgins complained:

Technology Review, according to [and so-editor] Stephen [sic] Marcus... [subjects] its scientific contributors to rewrite rigors that would give fainting spells to the most obstreperous cub reporter. Marcus believes this produces readable prose on cabalistic subjects. I don't concord.[12]

In 1984, Engineering Review printed an article about a Russian scientist using ova from frozen mammoths to create a mammoth-elephant hybrid called a "mammontelephas".[xiii] Apart from being dated "April 1, 1984", at that place were no obvious giveaways in the story. The Chicago Tribune News Service picked it upwardly every bit a real news item, and it was printed as fact in hundreds of newspapers.

The prank was presumably forgotten by 1994, when a survey of "opinion leaders" ranked Engineering Review [five] No. 1 in the nation in the "most credible" category.[xiv]

Contributors to the magazine also included Thomas A. Edison, Winston Churchill, and Tim Berners-Lee.[xv]

Relaunch: 1998–2005 [edit]

A radical transition of the magazine occurred in 1996. At that time, according to the Boston Business organisation Periodical,[16] in 1996 Technology Review had lost $1.half dozen million over the previous 7 years and was "facing the possibility of folding" due to "years of declining advertising revenue."

R. Bruce Journey was named publisher, the first full-time publisher in the magazine's history. According to previous publisher William J. Hecht, although Engineering science Review had "long been highly regarded for its editorial excellence," the purpose of appointing Journey was to enhance its "commercial potential" and "secure a prominent place for Technology Review in the competitive world of commercial publishing."[17] John Benditt replaced Steven J. Marcus equally editor-in-chief, the unabridged editorial staff was fired, and the modern Technology Review was built-in.

Boston Globe columnist David Warsh[18] described the transition by proverb that the magazine had been serving upward "old 1960s views of things: humanist, populist, ruminative, suspicious of the unseen dimensions of new technologies" and had at present been replaced with one that "takes innovation seriously and enthusiastically." Former editor Marcus characterized the mag's new stance as "cheerleading for innovation."

Nether Bruce Journey, Technology Review billed itself as "MIT's Magazine of Innovation". Since 2001, it has been published by Engineering science Review Inc., a nonprofit independent media company owned by MIT.[19]

Intending to appeal to business leaders, editor John Benditt said in 1999, "We're really most new technologies and how they get commercialized." Applied science Review covers breakthroughs and current issues on fields such as biotechnology, nanotechnology, and computing. Articles are also devoted to more mature disciplines such every bit energy, telecommunications, transportation, and the war machine.

Since Journey, Technology Review has been distributed equally a regular mass-market place magazine and appears on newsstands. By 2003, circulation had more than tripled from 92,000 to 315,000, virtually half that of Scientific American, and included 220,000 paid subscribers and 95,000 sent free to MIT alumni. Additionally, in August 2003, a German edition of Technology Review was started in cooperation with the publishing house Heinz Heise (apportionment of nearly 50,000 as of 2005). According to The New York Times,[20] equally of 2004 the magazine was however "partly financed by Thousand.I.T. (though it is expected to plow a turn a profit eventually)."

Technology Review too functions every bit the MIT alumni magazine; the edition sent to alumni contains a separate section, "MIT News," containing items such as alumni class notes. This department is not included in the edition distributed to the general public.

The magazine is published by Technology Review, Inc, an independent media visitor owned by MIT. MIT's website lists information technology every bit an MIT publication,[21] and the MIT News Office states that "the magazine often uses MIT expertise for some of its content." In 1999 The Boston World noted that (autonomously from the alumni department) "few Technology Review articles actually business organization events or inquiry at MIT."[22] Withal, in the words of editor Jason Pontin:

Our task is not to promote MIT; but we analyse and explicate emerging technologies,[23] and because we believe that new technologies are, mostly speaking, a good affair, nosotros exercise indirectly promote MIT'southward cadre action: that is, the development of innovative technology.[24]

From 1997 to 2005, R. Bruce Journey held the title of "publisher"; Journey was also the president and CEO of Technology Review, Inc. Editors-in-chief have included John Benditt (1997), Robert Buderi (2002), and Jason Pontin (2004).

The magazine has won numerous Folio! awards, presented at the annual magazine publishing merchandise show conducted past Folio! magazine. In 2001, these included a "Silver Folio: Editorial Excellence Award" in the consumer science and engineering science magazine category and many awards for typography and blueprint.[25] In 2006, Technology Review was named a finalist in the "general excellence" category of the annual National Mag Awards, sponsored by the American Society of Mag Editors.[26]

On June 6, 2001, Fortune and CNET Networks launched a publication entitled Fortune/CNET Applied science Review.[27] MIT sued[28] Fortune 'due south parent corporation, Fourth dimension, Inc. for infringement of the Technology Review trademark.[29] The instance was quickly settled. In August the MIT student newspaper reported that lawyers for MIT and Time were reluctant to discuss the case, citing a confidentiality understanding that both sides described every bit very restrictive. Jason Kravitz, a Boston attorney who represented MIT in the instance, suggested that the magazine'southward alter of name to Fortune/CNET Tech Review, a change that occurred in the middle of the example, may take been part of the settlement.[30]

Many publications covering specific technologies take used "technology review" equally part of their names, such every bit Lawrence Livermore Labs'southward Energy & Technology Review,[31] AACE's Educational Engineering Review,[32] and the International Diminutive Energy Agency's Nuclear Technology Review. [33]

In 2005, Technology Review, forth with Wired News and other technology publications, was embarrassed by the publication of a number of stories by freelancer Michelle Delio containing information which could not be corroborated. Editor-in-chief Pontin said, "Of the ten stories which were published, merely three were entirely accurate. In two of the stories, I'thou fairly confident that Michelle Delio either did non speak to the person she said she spoke to, or misrepresented her interview with him."[34] The stories were retracted.

Modernistic magazine: 2005–present [edit]

On August 30, 2005, Technology Review announced that R. Bruce Journey, publisher from 1996 to 2005, would be replaced by the and then current Editor in Chief, Jason Pontin, and would reduce the impress publication frequency from 11 to half-dozen issues per year while enhancing the publication's website.[34] The Boston Globe characterized the change equally a "strategic overhaul." Editor and publisher Jason Pontin stated that he would "focus the print magazine on what print does best: present[ing] longer-format, investigative stories and colorful imagery." Technology Review's Web site, Pontin said, would henceforth publish original, daily news and analysis (whereas before it had merely republished the print magazine's stories). Finally, Pontin said that Technology Review'south stories in print and online would place and analyze emerging technologies.[35] This focus resembles that of the historical Engineering science Review. Pontin convinced re-create editors to adopt the diaeresis mark for words like "coördinate", a rarity in native English usage, though failed to convince them to utilize logical punctuation.[36]

Without axiomatic comment, the July/August, 2017, outcome revealed a shift in superlative personnel, with Elizabeth Bramson-Boudreau listed as Principal Executive Officeholder and Publisher, and David Rotman every bit Editor.[1] Gideon Lichfield was named editor-in-chief in November 2017.[37]

In 2020, it was launched the brazilian version of MIT Engineering Review, known equally MIT Engineering science Review Brasil.[38]

Every yr, the magazine publishes a listing of the 10 technologies it considers the nearly influential.[39]

Annual lists [edit]

Each year, MIT Technology Review publishes three annual lists:

  • Innovators Under 35 (formerly TR35)
  • 10 Breakthrough Technologies
  • 50 Smartest Companies

Innovators Under 35 [edit]

MIT Engineering Review has become well known for its annual Innovators Under 35. In 1999, and then in 2002—2004, MIT Applied science Review produced the TR100, a list of "100 remarkable innovators under the age of 35." In 2005, this listing was renamed the TR35 and shortened to 35 individuals under the age of 35. Notable recipients of the award include Google co-founders Larry Folio and Sergey Brin, PayPal co-founder Max Levchin, Geekcorps creator Ethan Zuckerman, Linux developer Linus Torvalds, BitTorrent developer Bram Cohen, MacArthur "genius" bioengineer Jim Collins, investors Micah Siegel and Steve Jurvetson, and Netscape co-founder Marc Andreessen.[40] [41] The list was renamed Innovators Under 35 in 2013.

ten Breakthrough Technologies [edit]

2021 [edit]

Source:[42]

  1. Messenger RNA vaccines
  2. GPT-three
  3. Information trusts
  4. Lithium-metal batteries
  5. Digital contact tracing
  6. Hyper-accurate positioning
  7. Remote everything
  8. Multi-skilled AI
  9. TikTok recommendation algorithms
  10. Light-green hydrogen

2020 [edit]

Source:[43]

  1. Unhackable internet
  2. Hyper-personalized medicine
  3. Digital money
  4. Anti-aging drugs
  5. AI-discovered molecules
  6. Satellite mega-constellations
  7. Quantum supremacy
  8. Tiny AI
  9. Differential privacy
  10. Climate change attribution

2019 [edit]

MIT Technology Review editors invited Bill Gates to choose the 2019 list.[44]

  1. Robot dexterity
  2. New-wave nuclear ability
  3. Predicting preemies
  4. Gut probe in a pill
  5. Custom cancer vaccines
  6. The cow-gratis burger
  7. Carbon dioxide catcher
  8. An ECG on your wrist
  9. Sanitation without sewers
  10. Smoothen-talking AI assistants

2018 [edit]

Source:[45]

  1. 3-D metal printing
  2. Artificial embryos
  3. Sensing city
  4. AI for everybody
  5. Dueling neural networks
  6. Babel-fish earbuds
  7. Zero-carbon natural gas
  8. Perfect online privacy
  9. Genetic fortune-telling
  10. Materials' quantum leap

2017 [edit]

Source:[46]

  1. Reversing paralysis
  2. Self-driving trucks
  3. Paying with your face
  4. Applied quantum computers
  5. The 360-degree selfie
  6. Hot solar cells
  7. Cistron therapy 2.0
  8. The prison cell atlas
  9. Botnets of things
  10. Reinforcement learning

2016 [edit]

Source:[47]

  1. Allowed engineering
  2. Precise factor editing in plants
  3. Conversational interfaces
  4. Reusable rockets
  5. Robots that teach each other
  6. DNA app store
  7. SolarCity's Gigafactory
  8. Slack
  9. Tesla Autopilot
  10. Ability from the air

2015 [edit]

Source:[48]

  1. Magic bound
  2. Nano-architecture
  3. Car-to-machine communication
  4. Project Loon
  5. Liquid biopsy
  6. Megascale desalination
  7. Apple tree Pay
  8. Encephalon organoids
  9. Supercharged photosynthesis
  10. Internet of Deoxyribonucleic acid

2014 [edit]

Source:[49]

  1. Agricultural drones
  2. Ultraprivate smartphones
  3. Brain mapping
  4. Neuromorphic fries
  5. Genome editing
  6. Microscale iii-D press
  7. Mobile collaboration
  8. Oculus Rift
  9. Agile robots
  10. Smart air current and solar ability

2013 [edit]

Source:[l]

  1. Smart watches
  2. Ultra-efficient solar power
  3. Memory implants
  4. Prenatal Dna sequencing
  5. Deep learning
  6. Condiment manufacturing
  7. Big data from inexpensive phones
  8. Temporary social media
  9. Supergrids
  10. Baxter: the blue-neckband robot

2012 [edit]

Source:[51]

  1. Egg stem cells
  2. Ultra-efficient solar
  3. Low-cal-field photography
  4. Solar microgrids
  5. 3-D transistors
  6. A faster Fourier transform
  7. Nanopore sequencing
  8. Crowdfunding
  9. High-speed materials discovery
  10. Facebook'due south Timeline

2011 [edit]

Source:[52]

  1. Social ondexing
  2. Smart transformers
  3. Gestural interfaces
  4. Cancer genomics
  5. Solid-state batteries
  6. Homomorphic encryption
  7. Cloud streaming
  8. Crash-proof code
  9. Separating chromosomes
  10. Synthetic cells

2010 [edit]

Source:[53]

  1. Existent-time search
  2. Mobile three-D
  3. Engineered stalk cells
  4. Solar fuel
  5. Light-trapping photovoltaics
  6. Social TV
  7. Dark-green concrete
  8. Implantable electronics
  9. Dual-action antibodies
  10. Cloud programming

2009 [edit]

Source:[54]

  1. Intelligent software assistant
  2. $100 genome
  3. Racetrack memory
  4. Biological machines
  5. Paper diagnostics
  6. Liquid bombardment
  7. Traveling-wave reactor
  8. Nanopiezoelectronics
  9. HashCache
  10. Software-defined networking

Recognition [edit]

In 2006, Engineering Review was a finalist in the National Magazine Awards in the category of General Excellence.[55]

In 2010, Technology Review won the gold and silver prizes for best full issue of a technology mag (for its Nov and June 2009 problems) and the aureate, silver, and bronze prizes for best single article in a engineering magazine (for "Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map" past David Rotman;[56] "Prescription: Networking" by David Talbot;[57] and "Chasing the Lord's day" by David Rotman)[58] in the Folio Magazine Eddie Awards.[59]

In 2007, Engineering Review won the bronze prizes in the Folio Magazine Eddie Awards in the categories of best upshot of a technology magazine and all-time single engineering article.[sixty] That same twelvemonth, technologyreview.com won third identify in the MPA Digital Awards for best business or news Website and 2d place for best online video or video serial.[61]

In 2008, Technology Review won the aureate prize for the best consequence of a technology magazine (for its May 2008 effect); the gold, silverish, and bronze prizes for best unmarried manufactures in a technology magazine (for The Price of Biofuels by David Rotman;[62] Brain Trauma in Republic of iraq past Emily Vocalizer;[63] and Una Laptop por Niño by David Talbot);[64] the gold prize for all-time online community; and the bronze prize for all-time online tool in the Folio Mag Eddie Awards.[65] That same year, Technology Review won tertiary identify in the Magazine Publishers of America (MPA) Digital Awards for best online videos.[66]

In 2009, Engineering science Review won the gilded prize for Best Online News Coverage; the gold and silver prizes for all-time single articles in a applied science magazine (for "How Obama Really Did It" by David Talbot)[67] and "Can Technology Save the Economy?" by David Rotman[68] and the silvery prize for best online community in the Folio Magazine Eddie Awards.[69]

In 2011, Technology Review won the argent prize for best total issue of a applied science magazine (for its Jan 2011 issue) and the gold and silver prizes for best single commodity in a engineering science magazine (for "Moore's Outlaws" by David Talbot[lxx] and "Radical Opacity" by Julian Dibbell)[71] in the Page Magazine Eddie Awards.[72] That same twelvemonth, Technology Review was recognized for the best scientific discipline and engineering coverage in the Utne Reader Contained Press Awards.[73]

In 2012, MIT Technology Review won the golden and silverish prizes for best full event of a technology mag (for its June and October 2012 issues), and the gilded and bronze prizes for best single article in a technology magazine (for "People Ability ii.0" by John Pollock[74] and "The Library of Utopia" by Nicholas Carr)[75] in the Page Magazine Eddie Awards.[76] That same year, MIT Technology Review won the gilded prize for best feature design (for "The Library of Utopia" by Nicholas Carr)[75] in the Folio Mag Ozzie Awards.[77]

Run into too [edit]

  • Citizen Scientific discipline (The OED cites an article from the MIT Applied science Review in Jan 1989[78] as the first use of the term 'citizen science'.)

References [edit]

  1. ^ a b "MIT Applied science Review names Mat Honan its new editor in chief". MIT Technology Review (Press release). July nineteen, 2021. Retrieved February 7, 2022. Honan starts at MIT Engineering Review on August 17.
  2. ^ "AAM: Total Circ for Consumer Magazines". Accessabc.com. Archived from the original on 2012-06-04. Retrieved 2015-03-xxx .
  3. ^ "Terms of Service". MIT Engineering science Review. August 12, 2013. Retrieved Feb seven, 2022. MIT Technology Review is an independent media company owned past the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT).
  4. ^ "Our coverage is contained of whatever influence, including our buying by MIT". Retrieved 2018-xi-10 .
  5. ^ a b c d "Atechreview". Retrieved 2015-03-30 .
  6. ^ "MIT Technology Review". Retrieved 2021-xi-05 .
  7. ^ "Utne Independent Printing Awards: 2011 Winners". Utne. Archived from the original on 2016-04-03. Retrieved 2015-03-30 .
  8. ^ Yet, Scientific American has been published continuously since 1845, and Popular Science since 1872. In the personal advice cited above, Pontin says that the merits rests on the definition of a magazine every bit being perfect bound, Scientific American being in paper tabloid format in 1899.
  9. ^ The New York Times, January 21, 1899, page BR33.
  10. ^ Lidsky, Lawrence M. (October 1983). "The Trouble with Fusion" (PDF). MIT Engineering Review. pp. 32–44. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2015-09-23. Retrieved 2015-03-30 .
  11. ^ Amanda Schaffer (December 22, 2015). "Puzzle Corner's Keeper". MIT Applied science Review . Retrieved February seven, 2022. Allan Gottlieb '67 has been serving upwards math challenges to alumni and friends for half a century.
  12. ^ The Boston Globe, July 17, 1982.
  13. ^ http://www.textfiles.com/humor/woolly_m.amm Archived December 10, 2004, at the Wayback Machine
  14. ^ Charles H. Ball, News Office (1 February 1995). "Technology Review rated 'most credible'". MIT News . Retrieved 2015-03-thirty .
  15. ^ Crum, Male monarch (April 13, 1998). "MIT'southward 'TR' undergoes revamping". Bizjournals.com. Retrieved 2015-03-xxx .
  16. ^ "MIT's 'TR' undergoes revamping". Boston Business Journal . Retrieved 2015-03-30 .
  17. ^ The Boston Globe, April 25, 1999 p. G1
  18. ^ The Boston World, April 21, 1998 p. C1 "Gloom, Doom and Boom at MIT." Warsh analogized the old TR with honey departed Cambridge eateries similar the F&T Deli.
  19. ^ [one] Archived April 30, 2013, at the Wayback Machine
  20. ^ The New York Times, Nov ten, 2004, p. eight, "Glossy Alumni Magazines Seek More Than Graduates"
  21. ^ "MIT - offices+services". Mit.edu . Retrieved 2015-03-xxx .
  22. ^ The Boston World, April 25, 1999 p. G1 "MIT Tech Magazine, On Plateau, Finds Killer App: Capitalism"
  23. ^ "Emerging Technologies Reviews".
  24. ^ Jason Pontin, personal email to Dpbsmith, August 27, 2005
  25. ^ David Rapp, Technology Review (28 November 2001). "Applied science Review wins six awards". MIT News . Retrieved 2015-03-30 .
  26. ^ "Archived copy". searchpdffiles.com. Archived from the original on 11 February 2016. Retrieved 15 January 2022. {{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy every bit title (link)
  27. ^ Wall Street Journal Staff (2001-01-22). "Fortune, Cnet Enter Pact For Bug of Tech Reviews". The Wall Street Periodical. ISSN 0099-9660. Retrieved 2021-03-11 . {{cite news}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  28. ^ "MIT sues Time Inc. over magazine name". Boston Concern Periodical . Retrieved 2015-03-30 .
  29. ^ Trademark registration 0668713, registered Oct 21, 1958 to "Alumni Clan of the Massachusetts Institute of Engineering" and renewed in 1999.
  30. ^ "MIT Finishes Three Lawsuits, Initiates One During Summertime". Mit.edu. Retrieved 2015-03-xxx .
  31. ^ "Free energy and Engineering science Review". Llnl.gov . Retrieved 2015-03-xxx .
  32. ^ [2] Archived October 17, 2005, at the Wayback Machine
  33. ^ "Nuclear Applied science Review 2004" (PDF). Iaea.org. Retrieved 2015-03-30 .
  34. ^ a b The Boston Globe, April 22, 2005, p. C3 "More than of Author's Stories Faulted—MIT Says Only 3 of 10 were Authentic"
  35. ^ Jason Pontin (2005). "A Letter to MIT Alumni". Engineering science Review . Retrieved 2006-06-26 .
  36. ^ "You Become No Gotten in the New Yorker". As for the diareses, it'due south simply something we do: it shows y'all that the second vowel is pronounced as a second syllable. The New Yorker does it in this state, and information technology's not uncommon in the U.k.. At that place are a couple of other idiosyncratic style uses that I've been less successful in imposing on our copy desk. I'd dear to insist on what's called "logical punctuation" in the English language way, only the moral weight of the company insists that 'MIT Technology Review is an American publication.' (original comment on [3] earlier comments were disabled)
  37. ^ "MIT Technology Review Names Gideon Lichfield Editor in Principal". Engineering Review. 2017. Archived from the original on 2018-11-10. Retrieved 2019-03-thirteen .
  38. ^ https://mittechreview.com.br/.
  39. ^ Review, MIT Technology. "x Breakthrough Technologies 2006 - MIT Technology Review". Retrieved 20 September 2017.
  40. ^ "TR 100: Computing". MIT Engineering Review . Retrieved 2015-03-xxx . [ permanent dead link ]
  41. ^ "TR 35". MIT Technology Review . Retrieved 2015-03-xxx . [ permanent dead link ]
  42. ^ "10 Breakthrough Technologies 2021".
  43. ^ "2020".
  44. ^ "2019".
  45. ^ "2018".
  46. ^ "2017".
  47. ^ "2016".
  48. ^ "2015".
  49. ^ "2014".
  50. ^ "2013".
  51. ^ "10 Breakthrough Technologies 2012".
  52. ^ "10 Breakthrough Technologies 2011".
  53. ^ "x Quantum Technologies 2010".
  54. ^ "10 Breakthrough Technologies 2009".
  55. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2006-08-19. Retrieved 2006-07-27 . {{cite spider web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  56. ^ "Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map". MIT Engineering science Review.
  57. ^ "Prescription: Networking". MIT Technology Review.
  58. ^ "Chasing the Lord's day". MIT Applied science Review.
  59. ^ "2010 Folio: Award Winners Appear". Page. 2011-01-25.
  60. ^ "The 2007 Eddie & Ozzie Accolade Winners". Folio. November 2007.
  61. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2007-03-10. Retrieved 2007-03-06 . {{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy every bit title (link)
  62. ^ "The Price of Biofuels". MIT Technology Review.
  63. ^ "Encephalon Trauma in Iraq". MIT Technology Review.
  64. ^ "Una Laptop por Niño". MIT Technology Review.
  65. ^ "2008 Eddie Awards Winners". Page. 2008-09-23.
  66. ^ MPA Digital Awards 2008 Archived 2008-03-02 at the Wayback Machine
  67. ^ "How Obama Really Did It". MIT Engineering Review.
  68. ^ "Can Technology Save the Economy?". MIT Applied science Review.
  69. ^ "2009 Eddie Award Winners". Folio. December 2009.
  70. ^ "Moore's Outlaws". MIT Technology Review.
  71. ^ "Radical Opacity". MIT Technology Review.
  72. ^ "The 2011 Eddie and Ozzie Award Winners". Folio. 2011-12-08.
  73. ^ "Utne Independent Press Awards: 2011 Winners". Utne. Archived from the original on 2016-04-03. Retrieved 2011-06-08 .
  74. ^ "People Power 2.0". MIT Technology Review.
  75. ^ a b "The Library of Utopia". MIT Technology Review.
  76. ^ "Folio Magazine Eddie Awards 2012" (PDF). technologyreview.com.
  77. ^ "Folio Magazine Ozzie Awards 2012" (PDF). creative.red7media.com.
  78. ^ R. Kerson (1989). "Lab for the Environment". MIT Applied science Review. Vol. 92, no. 1. pp. 11–12.

External links [edit]

  • Official website Edit this at Wikidata

keetonutmacksmay39.blogspot.com

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIT_Technology_Review

0 Response to "What Type of Source Is the Mit Review"

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel